Question: What is best practice: Memory-based cache or database cache?


When debating between memory-based caching and database caching, it's important to understand their core differences and how they impact application performance. Each method has its own set of advantages and ideal use cases.

Memory-Based Caching


  • Speed: Memory-based caches store data in RAM, making access times significantly faster than disk-based storage.
  • Simplicity: Implementing a memory cache can be straightforward, especially with popular solutions like Redis or Memcached.


  • Volatility: Data stored in memory is usually volatile. If the server crashes or restarts, the cache is lost unless specific persistence mechanisms are employed.
  • Cost: RAM is more expensive than disk space, making large datasets costly to maintain in memory.

Example: Using Redis for Session Storage

import redis # Connect to Redis instance r = redis.Redis(host='localhost', port=6379, db=0) # Set key-value pairs in the cache r.set('user:1001', 'John Doe') # Get value from the cache print(r.get('user:1001')) # Output: b'John Doe'

Database Caching


  • Persistence: Cached data is less volatile and can survive server restarts depending on the database's durability settings.
  • Complex Queries: Database caches can efficiently handle complex queries and maintain indexed data.


  • Speed: While still faster than fetching data from the main database, it's generally slower than memory-based caching.
  • Complexity: Implementing caching logic within a database can introduce additional complexity into your system.

Best Practices:

  1. Assess Your Needs: Evaluate your application’s requirements. For read-heavy applications with relatively static data, memory-based caching could provide significant benefits. For applications requiring complex queries and persistence, database caching might be preferable.

  2. Hybrid Approaches: In many situations, a hybrid approach leveraging both memory-based and database caching can offer the best of both worlds. Use memory cache for frequently accessed, less-volatile data, and database caching for complex queries and data that requires persistence.

  3. Monitor Performance: Continuously monitor the performance impact of your caching strategy and adjust as needed. Effective monitoring can help you identify bottlenecks and optimize cache usage."

In conclusion, choosing between memory-based caching and database caching depends on your specific application needs, including factors such as data volatility, access patterns, budget constraints, and scaling considerations. In many cases, a combination of both strategies might yield the best results.

Was this content helpful?

Start building today

Dragonfly is fully compatible with the Redis ecosystem and requires no code changes to implement.