Dragonfly Cloud is now available in the AWS Marketplace - learn more

Top 88 IoT Databases

Compare & Find the Best IoT Database For Your Project.

Industries:AllIoTTelecommunicationsFinanceGaming
Database Types:AllTime SeriesKey-ValueDistributedEmbedded
Query Languages:AllPromQLCustom APIRESTFlux
Sort By:
DatabaseStrengthsWeaknessesTypeVisitsGH
Prometheus Logo
PrometheusHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2012
Powerful querying, Flexible, Robust alertingLimited long-term storage, Basic UITime Series233.5k55.8k
etcd Logo
etcdHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2013
High availability, Consistent, ReliableLimited to key-value storage, Not suited for large datasetsKey-Value, Distributed16.2k47.9k
LevelDB Logo
  //  
2011
High read/write performance, Simple and lightweight, Optimized for fast storageLimited to key-value storage, Not a relational database, No built-in replicationKey-Value, Embedded0.036.6k
InfluxDB Logo
InfluxDBHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2013
Optimized for time series data, High-performance writes and queriesLimited SQL support, Vertical scaling limitationsTime Series147.8k29.0k
RocksDB Logo
  //  
2013
High performance for write-heavy workloads, Optimized for fast storage environmentsComplex API, Lack of built-in replicationKey-Value, Embedded12.9k28.7k
RethinkDB Logo
  //  
2009
Real-time changes to query results, JSON document storageLimited active development, Not as popular as other NoSQL optionsDocument, Distributed2.8k26.8k
MongoDB Logo
MongoDBHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2009
Document-oriented, Scalable, Flexible schemaConsistency model, Memory usageDocument, NoSQL2.9m26.4k
Dragonfly Logo
  //  
2022
High throughput, Low latencyEarly stage, Limited documentationIn-Memory, Key-Value99.7k25.9k
Apache Flink Logo
  //  
2011
Highly scalable, Real-time data processing, Fault-tolerantComplexity in setup and management, Steeper learning curveStreaming, Distributed5.8m24.1k
TDengine Logo
TDengineHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2018
Time-series optimized, Lightweight and efficient, Built-in clusteringLimited support for complex queries, Smaller user communityTime Series, Distributed2.4k23.4k
TimescaleDB Logo
TimescaleDBHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2018
Excellent time-series support, Built on PostgreSQLRequires PostgreSQL knowledge, Limited features compared to specialized DBMSRelational, Time Series146.3k17.9k
QuestDB Logo
  //  
2019
High-performance for time-series data, SQL compatibility, Fast ingestionLimited ecosystem, Relatively newer databaseTime Series, Relational32.5k14.6k
Badger Logo
  //  
2017
High performance, Efficient key-value storage engineKey-value store specific limitations, Limited to embedded scenariosKey-Value, Embedded21.3k14.0k
ScyllaDB Logo
ScyllaDBHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2015
Extremely fast, Compatible with Apache Cassandra, Low latencyLimited built-in query language, Requires managing infrastructureDistributed, Wide Column69.4k13.6k
VictoriaMetrics Logo
VictoriaMetricsHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2018
Time-series optimizations, Scalability, Open-sourceNarrow focus on time-series data, Limited community compared to PrometheusTime Series30.2k12.4k
KeyDB Logo
  //  
2019
High-performance, Multi-threaded, Compatible with RedisRelatively new with a smaller community, Potential compatibility issues with Redis extensionsIn-Memory, Key-Value9.5k11.5k
YugabyteDB Logo
YugabyteDBHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2017
High availability, Horizontal scalability, Open sourceRelatively new, less mature, Smaller community compared to older databasesDistributed, NewSQL37.6k9.0k
Apache Cassandra Logo
Apache CassandraHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2008
High availability, Linear scalability, Fault tolerantComplexity of operation and maintenance, Limited query languageDistributed, Wide Column5.8m8.9k
BoltDB Logo
  //  
2013
Lightweight, EmbeddedLimited scalability, Single-reader limitationKey-Value, Embedded1.1m8.3k
LokiJS Logo
  //  
2014
In-memory database, Lightweight, FastLimited scalability, No built-in persistenceIn-Memory06.8k
SQLite Logo
  //  
2000
Serverless, Lightweight, Broadly supportedLimited to single-user access, Not suitable for high write loadsRelational, Embedded487.7k6.7k
Apache IoTDB Logo
  //  
2018
Highly efficient for time series data, Supports complex analytics, Integrated with IoT ecosystemsLimited support for transactional workloads, Relatively new and evolvingTime Series5.8m5.6k
EventStoreDB Logo
EventStoreDBHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2012
Strong event sourcing features, Efficient stream processingRequires expertise in event-driven architectures, Limited traditional RDBMS supportEvent Stores, Streaming9.8k5.3k
OpenTSDB Logo
  //  
2011
Scalable time series database, Strong community support, Highly optimized for large-scale dataComplex setup, Limited querying capabilities compared to SQL databasesTime Series1.1k5.0k
MapDB Logo
  //  
2011
In-memory, Embedded storageLimited functionality, No built-in networkingEmbedded, In-Memory, Key-Value7704.9k
M3DB Logo
  //  
2016
Highly scalable, Optimized for time series data, High availabilitySteep learning curve, Complex setupTime Series, Distributed14.8k
ObjectBox Logo
  //  
2017
High performance for embedded databases, Efficient object-oriented storageLimited cross-platform support, Smaller community compared to other DBMSEmbedded, Object-Oriented1.6k4.4k
CrateDB Logo
CrateDBHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2014
Scalable distributed SQL database, Handles time-series data efficiently, Native full-text search capabilitiesLimited support for complex joins, Relatively new with possible growing painsDistributed, Relational, Time Series3044.1k
LedisDB Logo
  //  
2014
In-memory, Key-Value store, Simplified interfaceLimited to key-value use cases, Lacks advanced featuresKey-Value, In-Memory0.04.1k
Skytable Logo
  //  
2021
High performance, Scalable, Multi-modelRelatively new, Limited communityKey-Value, Distributed, In-Memory12.4k
GridDB Logo
  //  
2014
Time series data handling, High scalability, IoT optimizedLimited ecosystem, Less community supportTime Series, In-Memory, Key-Value6.0k2.4k
KairosDB Logo
  //  
2012
Highly scalable, Optimized for time-series data, Open sourceLimited built-in analytics capabilities, Requires third-party tools for visualizationTime Series, Distributed0.01.7k
Elassandra Logo
  //  
2018
Combines Elasticsearch and Cassandra, Real-time search and analyticsComplex architecture, Requires deep technical knowledge to manageWide Column, Search Engine, Distributed01.7k
CnosDB Logo
  //  
2022
Time series focused, High throughputNew entrant in market, Limited community supportTime Series, Distributed1.8k1.7k
EJDB Logo
  //  
2020
Lightweight, Embedded, Cross-platformLimited scalability, Single-threadedDocument, Embedded91.4k
Realm Logo
RealmHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2011
Mobile-focused, Object-oriented, Offline-firstNot a full SQL replacement, Limited support for complex queriesDocument, Embedded1.6k1.0k
RRDtool Logo
  //  
1999
Efficient time series data storage, Compact data footprint, Good for monitoring dataLimited functionality compared to modern databases, Complex configuration for beginnersTime Series11.3k1.0k
Heroic Logo
  //  
2015
Time series data management, Scalability, Open-sourceNiche use case focus, Limited query language supportTime Series, Distributed0848
WhiteDB Logo
  //  
2011
In-memory database, Competitive read and write speedLimited persistence, No cloud offeringIn-Memory, Relational43608
Elliptics Logo
  //  
2009
Distributed, Fault-tolerant, Highly customizableComplex setup, Steep learning curveDistributed, Key-Value0497
Warp 10 Logo
  //  
2014
High scalability for time series, Rich analytics featuresComplex data model, Steep learning curveTime Series, Distributed47388
ReductStore Logo
  //  
2021
Simplified time series data storage, Efficient data recall, Compact data formatsLimited to time-series data, Recently developedTime Series, Event Stores146177
Tkrzw Logo
  //  
2019
Lightweight, Versatile, Highly efficientLack of advanced features, Smaller community baseEmbedded, Key-Value1.7k177
NosDB Logo
  //  
2015
Scalability, NoSQL capabilitiesLimited ecosystem, Learning curve for new usersDocument, Distributed7.9k44
Amazon DynamoDB Logo
Amazon DynamoDBHas Managed Cloud Offering
2012
Fully managed, High scalability, Event-driven architecture, Strong and eventual consistency optionsComplex pricing model, Query limitations compared to SQLDocument, Key-Value, Distributed762.1m0
Firebase Realtime Database Logo
Firebase Realtime DatabaseHas Managed Cloud Offering
2011
Real-time synchronization, Offline capabilities, Integrates well with other Firebase productsNo native support for complex queries, Not suited for large datasetsDocument, Distributed6.4b0
Google Cloud Datastore Logo
Google Cloud DatastoreHas Managed Cloud Offering
2013
Scalable NoSQL database, Fully managed, Integration with other Google Cloud servicesVendor lock-in, Complexity in querying complex relationshipsDocument, Distributed6.4b0
Microsoft Azure Table Storage Logo
Microsoft Azure Table StorageHas Managed Cloud Offering
2010
High availability, Massive scalability, Cost-effectiveLimited query capabilities, No complex queries or joinsDistributed, Key-Value723.2m0
Microsoft Azure Data Explorer Logo
Microsoft Azure Data ExplorerHas Managed Cloud Offering
2018
Real-time data analysis, Highly scalable, Integrated with Azure ecosystemComplex setup for new users, Azure dependencyAnalytical, Distributed, Streaming723.2m0
High performance for time-series data, Powerful analytical capabilitiesNiche use case focuses primarily on time-series, Less widespread adoptionTime Series, Distributed6190
Embedded database capabilities, Support for various platforms, Low footprintLimited awareness in the market, Older technology baseEmbedded00
Db4o Logo
  //  
2000
Lightweight, Object-Oriented databaseLimited support for distributed systems, Slower performance with complex queriesEmbedded, Object-Oriented00
Amazon Timestream Logo
Amazon TimestreamHas Managed Cloud Offering
2020
Optimized for time series data, Serverless and scalable, Built-in time series analyticsLimited to AWS ecosystem, Relatively new with less community supportTime Series762.1m0
Mnesia Logo
1993
Integrates with Erlang/OTP, Supports complex data structures, Highly availableLimited to Erlang ecosystem, Not suitable for very large datasetsDistributed, Relational, In-Memory74.1k0
Amazon Keyspaces Logo
Amazon KeyspacesHas Managed Cloud Offering
2020
Fully managed, Highly scalable, Compatible with Apache CassandraVendor lock-in, Higher cost at scaleWide Column762.1m0
Rockset Logo
RocksetHas Managed Cloud Offering
2018
Real-time analytics, Built-in connectors, SQL-poweredCan be costly, Limited to analytical workloadsAnalytical, Distributed, Document7.6k0
Fast in-memory processing, Suitable for embedded systems, Supports real-time applicationsMay not be ideal for large disk-based storage requirementsIn-Memory, Embedded2.0k0
HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric Logo
HPE Ezmeral Data FabricHas Managed Cloud Offering
2009
Scalability, High Performance, Integrated Data StoreComplexity, CostDistributed, Key-Value, Document, Time Series2.9m0
Sedna Logo
  //  
2019
Efficient XML Data Processing, Open SourceLimited Adoption, Niche Use CaseEmbedded, Machine Learning00
HarperDB Logo
HarperDBHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2017
Schema flexibility, High performance for mixed workloads, Easy deploymentRelatively new in the market, Limited enterprise adoptionDistributed, Document2.9k0
High performance for embedded systems, Real-time data processingNiche use case focus, Smaller developer communityRelational, Embedded8990
Perst Logo
2005
Embedded and lightweight, Java and C# support, Small footprintLimited scalability, Not suitable for large applicationsObject-Oriented, Embedded2.0k0
ITTIA Logo
2007
Embedded use, Power efficiency, Targeted at IoTLimited to embedded systemsEmbedded, In-Memory00
MyScale Logo
MyScaleHas Managed Cloud Offering
2022
Scalable, High performance for analytical queriesLimited documentation, Complex configurationTime Series, Distributed55.6k0
Alibaba Cloud TSDB Logo
Alibaba Cloud TSDBHas Managed Cloud Offering
2017
Scalable time series data storage, High performance for big data analysis, Seamless integration with Alibaba Cloud ecosystemLimited adoption outside of Alibaba Cloud ecosystem, Less community support compared to open-source alternativesTime Series1.3m0
Alibaba Cloud Table Store Logo
Alibaba Cloud Table StoreHas Managed Cloud Offering
2017
Scalable, High availability, Flexible data modelLimited language support, Complex setup for beginnersKey-Value, Wide Column, Time Series1.3m0
Time Series optimized, Powerful analytics toolsNiche use cases, Steep learning curveTime Series, Geospatial880
Speedb Logo
2021
High-speed operations, NoSQL capabilitiesRelatively new, Limited ecosystemEmbedded, Key-Value580
Scalable, Designed for time series data, High availabilityComplex setup, Limited query language supportTime Series, Key-Value2.2k0
Quasardb Logo
QuasardbHas Managed Cloud Offering
2009
High-speed data ingestion, Time series analysisComplex setup, CostDistributed, In-Memory, Time Series00
GreptimeDB Logo
  //  
2020
High performance, Scalable time-series storageRelatively new ecosystemDistributed, Time Series1.9k0
Bangdb Logo
BangdbHas Managed Cloud Offering
2013
High performance, Supports AI and machine learningLimited community support, Less known compared to mainstream databasesKey-Value, Document4.1k0
SiteWhere Logo
SiteWhereHas Managed Cloud Offering
  //  
2015
Open-source IoT platform, Flexible and scalableComplex setup for new users, Requires integration expertiseDistributed200
STSdb Logo
2010
In-memory performance, LightweightLimited compared to full-featured DBMS, No cloud offeringIn-Memory, Key-Value97.6k0
Efficiency in edge computing, Data synchronizationNewer product with less maturity, Limited ecosystemEmbedded, Relational, Document4.8k0
Acebase Logo
Unknown
N/AN/ADocument, NoSQL0.00
SwayDB Logo
  //  
2018
Highly scalable, Simplified design, Immutable structureLimited ecosystem, Niche user baseKey-Value, Embedded00
BergDB Logo
Unknown
N/AN/AIn-Memory, Distributed00
Cachelot.io Logo
  //  
2016
High performance, In-memory key-value storageLimited feature set, Primarily for cachingIn-Memory, Key-Value1440
Optimized for edge computing, Low latency processing, Real-time analyticsLimited support for complex query languages, May require specialized hardwareDistributed, Machine Learning890
Helium Logo
2019
Highly efficient, Immutable storageLimited query options, Niche use casesIn-Memory, Document, Distributed880
High performance, Scalable architectureProprietary system, Limited documentationEmbedded, Hierarchical00
K-DB Logo
Unknown
High-speed columnar processing, Strong for financial applicationsLimited general-purpose usage, Specialized use caseTime Series, In-Memory124.8k0
Newts Logo
unknown
Time Series Management, Scalability, EfficiencyLimited Documentation, Lack of Major Community SupportTime Series, Distributed0.00
NSDb Logo
  //  
unknown
Distributed Architecture, Real-Time ProcessingEmerging Ecosystem, Integration ChallengesTime Series, Distributed280
OpenTenBase Logo
  //  
unknown
Flexibility, CustomizabilityLack of Enterprise Support, Niche MarketTime Series, In-Memory80
SiriDB Logo
2016
Optimized for Time Series Data, High Write PerformanceLimited Ecosystem IntegrationTime Series, Distributed00
Machbase Neo Logo
Machbase NeoHas Managed Cloud Offering
2020
High-performance for time series data, In-memory processingLimited to time series use cases, Less known in the marketTime Series, In-Memory6940

Overview of Database Applications in IoT

The Internet of Things (IoT) represents a vast and rapidly growing ecosystem of interconnected devices, sensors, and technologies designed to collect, transmit, and process data in real time. As IoT technology proliferates in homes, cities, industries, and beyond, the role of databases in managing this influx of data becomes crucial. Databases in IoT are pivotal in storing, organizing, and retrieving vast datasets generated by hundreds, thousands, or even millions of IoT devices. The diversity of data—from time-series readings to structured queries—requires flexible, scalable, and efficient database solutions that cater to the unique needs of the IoT landscape.

This guide explores how databases are applied within the IoT sector, diving into specific requirements, benefits, challenges, and future trends, all of which affect how businesses and society harness IoT information effectively.

Specific Database Needs and Requirements in IoT

High Scalability

IoT ecosystems are characterized by an ever-expanding network of devices generating massive data volumes. This requires databases capable of scaling vertically and horizontally to manage increasing loads as the number of connected devices grows.

Real-Time Data Processing

IoT applications often demand real-time data processing and analytics to facilitate quick decision-making. Databases used in IoT must therefore support low-latency operations to provide immediate insights from data streams.

Diverse Data Formats

IoT devices produce diverse data types, including structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data, across varying formats like JSON, CSV, XML, and Binary. The chosen database solution should accommodate heterogeneity and provide robust support for different data models, including documents, graphs, time-series, and more.

Support for Edge Computing

With the rise of edge computing in IoT, databases need to operate efficiently at the edge—close to where the data is being generated. This shift reduces latency and bandwidth requirements by executing preliminary data processing locally, often necessitating lightweight, and distributed database systems.

Robust Security and Privacy

IoT systems handle sensitive information, from personal data to critical infrastructure metrics. Databases must ensure data integrity, enforce stringent access controls, allow encryption both in transit and at rest, and guarantee compliance with regulatory standards, such as GDPR, HIPAA, or CCPA.

Benefits of Optimized Databases in IoT

Improved Data Management Efficiency

An optimized database enables streamlined data management processes, improving the efficiency of storing, retrieving, and analyzing data generated by IoT devices. This leads to enhanced operational performance and resource allocation.

Enhanced Data Accuracy and Consistency

By deploying databases that ensure high levels of data accuracy and consistency, organizations can improve the reliability of IoT systems, which depend on precise and consistent data inputs for effective decision-making processes.

Scalability and Flexibility

Optimized databases offer the scalability required to expand IoT ecosystems seamlessly. Flexibility in supporting various data types ensures that organizations can adapt to evolving IoT data demands without the need for extensive reconfiguration or onboarding new systems.

Better Insights and Decision-Making

Leveraging optimized databases contributes to improved analytics and reporting, furnishing businesses with actionable insights that aid in strategic planning, preventive maintenance, anomaly detection, and customer experience enhancements.

Cost Efficiency

An efficient database system can lower operational costs by optimizing storage solutions, scaling resources dynamically based on demand, reducing data duplication, and supporting automation in data processing.

Challenges of Database Management in IoT

Data Overload

The sheer volume of data generated by IoT devices can lead to database systems becoming overwhelmed, resulting in processing delays and inefficiencies. Effective data filtering and prioritization are crucial to mitigating data overload.

Complexity in Integration

Integrating databases with diverse IoT devices and platforms can be complex, often requiring customized solutions for seamless connectivity and compatibility, a process that can be both time-consuming and costly.

Ensuring Data Security

Securing IoT data remains a significant challenge, with vulnerabilities potentially leading to data breaches or unauthorized access. Implementing comprehensive security measures within databases is critical to defending data integrity.

Maintaining Low Latency

As IoT systems often rely on real-time data, maintaining low latency in data processing and transmission can be challenging, especially when data passes through multiple nodes or requires complex transformations.

Continuous Availability

Many IoT applications, such as those in healthcare or smart cities, necessitate continuous database availability to function without disruption. Ensuring high availability involves implementing robust disaster recovery and failover strategies.

Future Trends in Database Use in IoT

Rise of Edge Databases

As IoT continues the shift toward edge computing to boost response times and reduce bandwidth usage, edge databases that offer lightweight, distributed capabilities, and support for AI and machine learning analytics at the edge will become more prevalent.

Increasing Use of AI and Automation

AI-powered databases that leverage machine learning for predictive analytics, automated anomaly detection, efficient query handling, and intelligent indexing will become instrumental in enhancing database performance and IoT system integrations.

Evolution of Time-Series Databases

With time-series data forming the crux of many IoT applications, time-series-specific databases will become increasingly sophisticated, providing better querying, real-time analytics, and optimized storage solutions for temporal data.

Enhanced Interoperability

The demand for interoperability between different IoT platforms and devices will lead to database solutions progressing towards adopting more open standards and APIs, fostering synergy across various IoT ecosystems.

Privacy-First Database Designs

As data privacy concerns dominate, databases will evolve to incorporate privacy-first designs, enabling data processing and analytics capabilities that prioritize user control over personal data while complying with strict regulatory requirements.

Conclusion

The integration of databases within the IoT ecosystem is indispensable for harnessing the full potential of connected devices, enabling efficient data handling, real-time analytics, and robust security. As IoT technology continjes to expand, the demands on databases will evolve, requiring innovative solutions that address scalability, interoperability, and privacy concerns. By staying ahead of these trends and challenges, businesses can maximize the benefits offered by IoT databases, unlocking new opportunities and fostering advancements in smart technology applications.

Switch & save up to 80% 

Dragonfly is fully compatible with the Redis ecosystem and requires no code changes to implement. Instantly experience up to a 25X boost in performance and 80% reduction in cost