Top 27 In-Memory Databases Compared

Compare & Find the Perfect In-Memory Database For Your Project.

DatabaseStrengthsWeaknessesPure In-Memory
Redis Logo
Fast operations, Pub/Sub capabilities, Extensible through modules, Rich data structuresLimited query capabilities, Persistence can affect performanceYes
DragonflyDB Logo
High performance, Supports Redis and Memcached protocols, Low memory overheadNewer and less proven than competitors, Limited community and supportYes
Memcached Logo
Simple design, High performance for caching, Widely used and supportedNo built-in persistence, No data replication or shardingYes
KeyDB Logo
Multithreading for performance, Compatible with Redis protocols, Active replication and high availabilityRelatively new, smaller community, Limited awareness and adoption compared to RedisYes
Advanced analytics processing, High performance, Integration with SAP applications, ACID compliantCostly for small to medium businesses, Complexity in management and monitoring, Limited to SAP ecosystemNo
Oracle TimesTen Logo
Oracle TimesTen
High throughput, Low latency, Real-time performanceProprietary software, Cost associated with Oracle productsYes
Tarantool Logo
High performance, Scalability, Fibers for concurrent tasksLearning curve, Less established than competitorsYes
Aerospike Logo
Highly scalable, Consistency and reliability, Hybrid memory architectureComplexity in deployment, Higher learning curveYes
Hazelcast IMDG Logo
Hazelcast IMDG
High availability, Elastic scalability, Strong consistencyLimited querying capabilities, Complex configuration for large clustersYes
Apache Ignite Logo
Apache Ignite
Versatile general-purpose in-memory computing platform, Integrated distributed computations, Advanced clusteringPotentially steep learning curve, Memory managementNo
VoltDB Logo
High throughput, Low-latency, Strong consistency, SQL supportLimited data size to RAM, Complexity in horizontal scalingYes
ScyllaDB Logo
High performance, Scalability, Compatibility with Apache CassandraComplex setup for optimal performance, Younger communityNo
Couchbase Logo
Flexible data model, N1QL - SQL for JSON, Full-text searchLearning curve for N1QL, Cost for enterprise featuresNo
RocksDB Logo
Strong read and write performance, Flexible storage options, EmbeddableAPI complexity, Manual tuning requiredNo
LevelDB Logo
Lightweight, Fast reads and writes, Simple designNo built-in replication or transactions, Single-processNo
High read performance, Memory-efficient, Supports multi-threading and multi-process configurations, Low latencyLimited to single-machine, Write operations can be slower due to single-writer design, Not as feature-rich as some other databasesYes
Pivotal GemFire Logo
Pivotal GemFire
Scalability, High availability and disaster recovery, Real-time event processing and notifications, Support for complex transactionsComplexity in setup and management, Cost (for enterprise versions)No
Oracle Coherence Logo
Oracle Coherence
Scalability, High availability, Data grid computing capabilities, Integration with Oracle productsComplex configuration and management, Cost, Heavily tied to the Java ecosystem, Learning curveNo
IBM Db2 with BLU Acceleration Logo
IBM Db2 with BLU Acceleration
Speed of analytics queries with BLU Acceleration, Advanced compression techniques, Integration with IBM analytics and data ecosystem, Row and columnar data capabilitiesCost, Complexity in administration for some users, Mainly optimized for analytics rather than OLTPNo
NuoDB Logo
Scalability across multiple hosts, SQL compatibility, ACID compliance for transactional integrity, Low-latency responsesLess mature community compared to traditional RDBMS, May require expertise for deployment and management, Performance can vary based on deployment architectureNo
Google Cloud Datastore Logo
Google Cloud Datastore
Fully managed, Highly scalable, Built-in query engineLimited to Google Cloud, Not a pure in-memory solutionNo
Amazon DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX) Logo
Amazon DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX)
Microsecond latency, Fully managed, Seamlessly integrates with DynamoDBAWS specific, Additional costNo
Infinispan Logo
Highly scalable, Open-source, Rich set of APIsHigher learning curve, Manual scaling and managementYes
Ehcache Logo
Wide industry usage, Lightweight, Simple APIManual clustering setup, No built-in query languageYes
HyperSQL DataBase (HSQLDB) Logo
HyperSQL DataBase (HSQLDB)
ACID compliant, Small footprint, Fast data accessLimited by JVM memory, Not designed for large datasetsNo
Neo4j Logo
Highly flexible and agile data model, Efficient graph algorithms, ACID compliant transactions, Rich ecosystem and communityLearning curve for graph databases, Might not be as performant for non-graph use casesNo
Riak KV Logo
Riak KV
High availability, Fault-tolerant, Ease of scaling, Operational simplicityRelatively high latency compared to some in-memory databases, Limited query capabilitiesNo


In-memory databases (IMDB) are a relatively new type of database technology that have become increasingly popular in recent years. Unlike traditional disk-based databases, IMDBs store data entirely in memory, rather than on disk, resulting in much faster access times.

What Is an In-Memory Database?

An in-memory database (IMDB) is a type of database management system that stores data entirely in the main memory of a computer, rather than on disk or other external storage devices. This means that all data is stored in RAM, which makes it much faster to access and manipulate than traditional disk-based databases.

IMDBs are designed for high-performance use cases that require fast data access and processing times, such as real-time analytics, high-frequency trading, and complex event processing.

How Do IMDBs Differ From Traditional Disk-Based Databases

In traditional disk-based databases, data is stored on physical disks and accessed through a file system. When data is read or written to the database, the operating system must fetch the data from the disk and load it into memory before it can be processed. This process can be slow and inefficient, particularly when dealing with large datasets or complex queries.

In contrast, IMDBs store all data in memory, eliminating the need for disk access altogether. This makes them much faster and more efficient than traditional databases, particularly for read-heavy workloads.

Use Cases

Applications that Can Benefit From IMDBs

IMDBs can be beneficial for applications that require real-time data processing, such as financial trading systems, online gaming, or e-commerce platforms. They can also be useful for applications that handle large datasets, such as big data analytics, machine learning, and scientific simulations.

Examples of Companies that Use IMDBs

Some of the well-known companies that use IMDBs include Twitter, Facebook, Amazon, and Cisco. Twitter uses an open-source IMDB called Apache Cassandra to store billions of tweets and user interactions. Facebook uses their own IMDB called TAO to store user data and power their social graph. Amazon uses IMDBs for their DynamoDB and ElastiCache services. Cisco uses IMDBs to power their network analysis tools.

Comparison of IMDBs with Other Database Technologies for Specific Use Cases

While IMDBs offer benefits for certain applications, they are not always the best choice for every use case. For example, disk-based databases may be more suitable for applications that require durability over speed. Relational databases may be better suited for applications that require complex data relationships and structured querying. It's important to evaluate the specific needs of your application when choosing a database technology.

How In-Memory Databases Work

Overview of How Data Is Stored in Memory

IMDBs are designed to store data in computer memory, which allows for faster access and retrieval times. When data is stored in memory, it can be accessed directly by the CPU without having to go through slower disk I/O operations. In-memory databases can use a variety of data structures to store data efficiently, such as hash tables or B-trees.

Explanation of Data Retrieval and Processing

When data is requested from an IMDB, it can be retrieved quickly since it's stored in memory. This allows for faster processing times and reduced latency. Data processing can also be performed in-memory, which can improve performance by avoiding disk I/O bottlenecks. IMDBs can also use parallel processing techniques to further speed up data processing.

Management of Data Consistency and Durability

Since IMDBs store data in volatile memory, there is a risk of data loss in the event of a system failure or power outage. To prevent this, IMDBs typically use techniques such as replication and checkpointing to maintain data consistency and durability. Replication involves duplicating data across multiple nodes in a cluster, while checkpointing involves periodically writing data to disk to ensure that it's not lost in the event of a failure.

Advantages and Disadvantages

Advantages of Using an IMDB

  1. Increased Performance: One of the primary advantages of using an IMDB is speed. By eliminating the need to read from or write to disks, IMDBs can deliver lightning-fast read and write performance. This makes them ideal for high-volume transactional applications or any application where fast access to data is critical.

  2. Lower Latency: Since an IMDB stores all data in memory, it eliminates the latency associated with accessing data from storage devices. This results in quicker response times, making IMDBs suitable for real-time applications such as financial trading or online gaming.

  3. Simplified Architecture: Disk-based databases are often complex and require layers of caching and optimization to deliver acceptable performance. IMDBs eliminate many of these layers, simplifying the architecture of the system and reducing the complexity of the database.

  4. Reduced Costs: While the cost of memory has decreased over the years, it remains relatively expensive compared to disk storage. However, the reduced complexity of an IMDB can offset this cost by reducing hardware requirements and operational expenses.

Disadvantages of Using an IMDB

  1. Limited Capacity: The amount of data that can be stored in memory is limited by the amount of available RAM in the system. This can make IMDBs unsuitable for applications that deal with large datasets.

  2. Data Durability: In-memory databases don't inherently provide durability since they rely on volatile memory. This means that if there is a power outage or system crash, data loss can occur. However, most IMDBs include mechanisms to ensure data persistence, such as logging changes to disk.

Comparison of IMDBs with Traditional Databases

Traditional databases store data on disk, which provides durability and the ability to store large amounts of data. However, disk-based databases suffer from performance limitations that can impact their suitability for certain applications. IMDBs deliver superior performance but lack the durability and capacity of traditional databases. Thus, choosing the right database for an application depends on its specific requirements.

In-Memory Database Performance - What You Need To Know

In-memory databases are faster than disk-based databases as they store data directly in the computer's RAM. However, all data must fit into memory or performance may suffer, making it essential to estimate the size of data carefully. In-memory databases work best with structured data that can be easily indexed and queried, but may not be suitable for unstructured or semi-structured data such as text documents or multimedia files.

Choosing an In-Memory Database

When choosing an in-memory database, there are several factors to consider. Here are a few things to keep in mind:

1. Data Structure Support

Different in-memory databases may support different data structures, such as key-value pairs, document stores, or graph databases. Make sure to choose a database that supports the data structures that you need.

2. Scalability

In-memory databases can be highly scalable, but it's important to choose a database that can handle your expected workload. Some databases may be better suited for small-scale use cases, while others are designed for large-scale, distributed systems.

3. Durability

In-memory databases rely on keeping all of your data in memory, which means that they are vulnerable to data loss in the event of a power outage or other system failure. Look for databases that offer durability options, such as persistence to disk or replication to multiple nodes.

VIII. Conclusion In-memory databases can provide significant performance benefits compared to disk-based databases, particularly when dealing with structured data that can be easily indexed and queried. When choosing an in-memory database, it's important to consider factors such as data structure support, scalability, and durability. Dragonfly and Redis are two popular options that support a variety of use cases and programming languages.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best in-memory database?

The answer to the question "What is the best in-memory database?" depends on specific use cases and requirements. However, some popular in-memory databases that are widely used and highly regarded by developers include Dragonfly, Redis, Apache Ignite, and VoltDB. Dragonfly is known for its performance and compatibility to existing popular databases, Redis is known for its speed and flexibility, while Apache Ignite is praised for its ability to handle large datasets and support for distributed computing. VoltDB, on the other hand, is known for its ACID compliance and ability to process real-time transactions. Ultimately, the best in-memory database will depend on the specific needs and goals of your project.

Is MySQL an in-memory database?

MySQL is not an in-memory database by default. It is a traditional relational database management system that stores data on disk and retrieves it as needed. However, MySQL does support various caching mechanisms that can improve its performance and reduce the need for disk access. For example, MySQL has an internal buffer pool that caches frequently accessed data in memory to speed up queries. Additionally, MySQL can be configured to use third-party caching solutions like Dragonfly, Memcached or Redis to further improve performance.

Is MongoDB an in-memory database?

MongoDB is not strictly an in-memory database, as it uses both memory and disk to store data. However, MongoDB does have the capability to use memory mapped files, which allow frequently accessed data to be loaded into memory for faster access times. This approach is known as memory-mapped I/O, which provides a way to access data stored on disk as if it were stored in memory. Therefore, while MongoDB is not purely an in-memory database, it can utilize memory effectively to improve performance.

What is the difference between database and in-memory database?

A traditional database is a software application that stores, manages, and retrieves data from persistent storage on disk. In contrast, an in-memory database resides entirely in the main memory of a computer and stores data in volatile memory instead of permanent storage. Because of this, in-memory databases offer significantly faster performance than traditional databases by eliminating the need to read and write data to disk. However, the size of the dataset that can be stored in an in-memory database is typically limited by the amount of available memory, whereas traditional databases can handle much larger datasets.

Start building today

Dragonfly is fully compatible with the Redis ecosystem and requires no code changes to implement.