Comparing the speed of Memcached and Redis can be a bit tricky as they serve different use cases. However, in general, Memcached is known to be faster than Redis for simple key-value data caching.
Memcached was originally developed as a distributed memory object caching system, primarily used for speeding up dynamic web applications by alleviating database load. It has a very simple architecture with a focus on performance, which makes it extremely fast. Memcached is designed to store key-value pairs in memory, which allows for very quick access times.
Redis, on the other hand, is a more feature-rich data structure server that provides additional functionality beyond key-value caching. Redis is designed to be persistent, scalable, and reliable. Redis supports advanced data structures, such as lists, sets, hashes and sorted sets, which make it more flexible than Memcached but also slightly slower.
In terms of benchmarks, it can vary depending on the specific use case and workload. For example, in tests conducted by Redis Labs, Redis outperformed Memcached in scenarios where there were more complex data structures involved or when the dataset size was too large to fit into memory. In contrast, Memcached performed better in simpler key-value lookups.
Here's an example of using Memcached in Python:
And here's an example of using Redis in Python:
In conclusion, while Memcached is generally faster than Redis for simple key-value caching scenarios, Redis provides more advanced data structures and additional functionalities that make it more suitable for complex use cases where speed may not be the only factor to consider.